|
On 30 June 2026, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) filed a lawsuit in the Federal Court of Australia against Amazon Commercial Services Pty Ltd (Amazon AU). The regulator alleges that Amazon used unfair contract terms in its Prime subscription agreements and later relied on those terms to introduce advertisements in Prime Video, affecting more than one million Australian subscribers.
This case is one of the first major lawsuits under Australia's strengthened unfair contract term laws, which started imposing financial penalties from 9 November 2023. The outcome could significantly influence how digital subscription services modify their contracts and services.
What Is the Dispute?
The ACCC claims that between November 2023 and August 2025, Amazon's Prime membership contracts contained five unfair terms. According to the regulator, these clauses allowed Amazon to change important features of the service during the subscription period without giving consumers any meaningful remedy, such as a refund or the right to cancel.
The dispute centres on Amazon's decision to introduce advertisements in Prime Video in July 2024. Previously, Prime Video offered an almost ad-free viewing experience. After the change, subscribers who wanted to continue watching without advertisements had to pay an additional A$2.99 per month, despite already paying A$79 annually for their Prime membership.
The ACCC argues that consumers were forced to either accept a reduced-quality service with advertisements or pay extra to receive the service they originally purchased.
Legal Basis of the Case
The lawsuit is based on the Australian Consumer Law (ACL), which protects consumers from unfair contract terms.
Under the ACL, a contract term is considered unfair if it:
The ACCC alleges that Amazon's contract terms allowed it to make unilateral changes to the service without offering compensation or other protections to subscribers.
Importantly, since November 2023, businesses can face substantial financial penalties merely for including or relying on unfair contract terms. This makes the Amazon case one of the earliest significant tests of Australia's new enforcement regime.
Amazon US Also Under Scrutiny
The ACCC has also alleged that Amazon.com Services LLC (Amazon US) was involved in the conduct. According to the regulator, the parent company helped draft the Australian subscription agreements, made the global decision to introduce advertising on Prime Video, and assisted in implementing the changes in Australia.
This suggests the regulator is seeking accountability beyond the Australian subsidiary.
Relief Sought by the ACCC
The ACCC has asked the Federal Court to grant:
If successful, the case could result in significant penalties and compensation for over one million Australian consumers.
Amazon's Response
Amazon has stated that it is reviewing the ACCC's claims and has cooperated throughout the regulator's investigation. The company also said it remains committed to providing the best possible experience for Australian customers. It has not yet filed its formal defence before the Court.
Why This Case Matters
The lawsuit is more than a dispute over streaming advertisements. It represents an important legal test of whether businesses can rely on one-sided contract terms to change subscription services after consumers have already paid.
A ruling in favour of the ACCC could strengthen consumer protection in Australia and set an important precedent for subscription-based businesses worldwide. It would reinforce the principle that companies cannot unilaterally reduce the value of prepaid services without providing consumers with a fair remedy.
Reference
Tags : International Legal Article
Copyright A unit of White Code Global Consulting Pvt Ltd. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by A unit of White Code Global Consulting Pvt Ltd. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.
