News By/Courtesy: Neha Mishra | 29 Nov 2021 16:46pm IST


  • A trans woman filed an appeal in the High Court of Allahabad in a quest to get her mark-sheet and certificates updated after the sex change operation.
  • She was previously denied the request by the Examination Committee of UP.
  • The High Court upholding the appeal asked the school to make the changes as soon as possible.

In a significant order, the Allahabad High Court as of late guided State specialists to find prompt ways to change the name and sex in the educational results and certificates of a trans-woman who went through sexual orientation reassignment medical procedure.

Justice Vivek Chaudhary was hearing an appeal moved by one Shivanya Pandey, a transwoman who as of late went through a sexual orientation reassignment medical procedure. The candidate looked for headings from the Court to change her name and sexual orientation in registration mark sheets and testaments. Shivanya was experiencing sexual orientation dysphoria and went through a sex reassignment medical procedure from male to female in the year 2017. After this, her Aadhaar and PAN cards were given in her new name and sexual orientation. As a fundamental change, the applicant had applied for the difference in her name and sex in her secondary school results and certificates. The State specialists, including the Examination Committee of the Uttar Pradesh Board, did not engage the petition of Shivanya, the petitioner expressing that neither the guidelines nor the arrangements of Intermediate Education Act, 1921 had any arrangement in regards to something similar.

Wronged by the said order, the applicant moved toward the High Court. Depending vigorously on the judgement of the Supreme Court in National Legal Services Authority v. Association of India and Others (NALSA Case), the candidate contended that the option to choose self-personality and sexual orientation is a characteristic right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Further, Section 6(1) of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019 explicitly gives that "assuming the transsexual individual goes through a medical procedure to change sex, such individual might make an application, alongside a testament gave with that impact by the Superintendent or Chief Medical Officer of the clinical foundation where that individual has gone through a medical procedure, to the District Magistrate for a modified declaration in the recommended way."

It was in this way contended that the applicant is qualified for the issuance of suitable certificate changes taking into account her difference in sexual orientation. It was contended for the benefit of the State that since the candidate went through a sexual orientation reassignment medical procedure before initiation of the 2019 Act, she was not qualified for apply for the reexamined mark sheets and testaments under the said Act.

Subsequent to hearing the gatherings, the Court at the start noted: "The actual motivation behind acquiring power the Act is to give balance and regard to the transsexual people. The Act is a socially useful enactment and accordingly, this Act can't be given a translation that would invalidate the very point for which the equivalent is gotten power. It must be deciphered in a way that grave reason for which it is administered is accomplished."

Moreover, the Court saw that Section 7 of the 2019 Act, which subtleties the strategy for issuance of sexual orientation change endorsement, is needed to be deciphered in a way that both transsexual people who are given a declaration under Section 6 and people like the solicitor who had gone through the sex reassignment technique preceding beginning of the 2019 Act, are qualified for apply for issuance of a sex change authentication before the District Magistrate.

Taking note of that denying such a right to people who had as of now gone through sex reassignment medical procedure would baffle the actual motivation behind the 2019 Act, the Court permitted the solicitor to present an application under Section 7 of the 2019 Act to the District Magistrate. The Court likewise coordinated that after the issuance of an endorsement by the District Magistrate, Shivanya will be at freedom to move toward the concerned experts for issuance of new declarations and mark sheets. The State specialists were additionally coordinated to make quick strides for change of name and sex in the mark sheets and declarations of the applicant.

Section Editor: Kadam Hans | 29 Nov 2021 19:35pm IST

Tags : #trans-woman #Allahabad #High Court #appeal #Examination Committee #UP #NALSA case #Transgender Persons Act, 2019 #man-to-woman #order

Latest News

Copyright Kalyan Krishna MediaZ Private Limited. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Kalyan Krishna MediaZ Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.