News By/Courtesy: Neha Mishra | 12 Nov 2021 14:14pm IST


  • A woman who is a house help kidnapped her employer's child
  • She argued that she only kidnapped the child to retrieve the wages her employer had not yet paid
  • The court rejected her plea for bail.

A Delhi Court as of late dismissed the bail request of a lady blamed for capturing her boss' child in a bid to recuperate her wages. Samar Vishal who is the Additional Sessions Judge dismissed the lady's bail request thinking about the reality of the supposed wrongdoing.

"Regardless of whether she has abducted the kid to recuperate her wages, it can, by no inspire bigger thoughts, be a technique for the recuperating her wages. There are counter cases from both the sides concerning whether she requested wages or more cash which will be decided in the trial," the bail request expressed. The Court noticed that the lady may be a flight hazard as she had no long-lasting location in Delhi. In this way, she was, by all appearances expressed to have no case for bail at the current stage. The lady was reserved under Section 363 (kidnapping) and also 364A of the Indian Penal Code. Section 364 of the Indian Penal Code talks about kidnapping and maiming for begging.

It came on record that she functioned as house assistance in the home of the complainant and in the wake of kidnapping the child, went to Alwar, Rajasthan. From that point, the lady was expressed to have sent messages to the guardians requesting instalment of her wages and threatened them of desperate results, including killing the child, if her requests were not met. Direction showing up for the complainant just as the public investigator went against the bail application battling that she had no long-lasting location in Delhi and had committed a grave offence, which was culpable with capital punishment.

Further, her aim was obvious from the messages she sent. It was additionally contended that the cases of her direction that she was poor and the main provider for the family weren't right, as she had left her parental home in 2018 - a reality not denied by her father who was available in court. Hence, after going through the arguments and the submitted proofs and witnesses, the Court excused the application.

Section Editor: Kadam Hans | 12 Nov 2021 18:52pm IST

Tags : #kidnapping #IPC #Delhi #child #employer #wages #trial court #Section 363 #Section 364A #kidnapping and maiming for begging

Latest News

Copyright Kalyan Krishna MediaZ Private Limited. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Kalyan Krishna MediaZ Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.