News By/Courtesy: Trupti Shetty | 06 Aug 2024 14:53pm IST

HIGHLIGHTS

  • Contingent Fee Arrangements (CFAs) are a type of AFA where a lawyer's remuneration is contingent upon the successful outcome of a case.
  • India can draw lessons from jurisdictions like Singapore, which have embraced CFAs in international and domestic arbitration.
  • Embracing CFAs, particularly in the context of international commercial arbitration, could significantly benefit India's legal landscape.

Reimagining Legal Practice in India: The Case for Contingent Fee Arrangements in International Commercial Arbitration

 

Introduction:

The landscape of international commercial disputes is evolving, with a growing recognition of the need for alternative fee arrangements (AFAs) to ensure economic viability for parties involved. However, in India, traditional doctrines of maintenance and champerty have hindered the adoption of such arrangements. This article explores the potential for AFAs in international commercial arbitration seated in India, emphasizing recent judicial developments and regulatory changes.

Understanding Contingent Fee Arrangements:

Contingent Fee Arrangements (CFAs) are a type of AFA where a lawyer's remuneration is contingent upon the successful outcome of a case. Common in jurisdictions like the United States and Canada, CFAs have been historically prohibited in India under the Advocates Act, 1961, and the Bar Council of India Rules (BCI Rules). The Indian Supreme Court's 1954 ruling in Re: Mr. 'G' v. Unknown deemed CFAs against public policy, fearing they could compromise a lawyer's impartiality and professional ethics.

Judicial Developments and Regulatory Shifts:

The Indian Supreme Court's decision in Bar Council of India v. A.K. Balaji highlighted a potential shift. While the court did not conclusively address restrictions on foreign lawyers in arbitration, it acknowledged the flexibility inherent in arbitration as a dispute resolution mechanism. This paves the way for reconsidering CFAs in international arbitration.

The 2022 Rules for Registration of Foreign Lawyers and Foreign Law Firms by the Bar Council of India mark a significant change, permitting foreign legal practitioners to engage in non-litigation ADR matters, including international arbitration. This regulatory evolution suggests a move towards a more inclusive legal framework, aligning with global practices.

Case Study: Jayaswal Ashoka Infrastructures v. Pansare Lawad Sallagar

The Bombay High Court's ruling in Jayaswal Ashoka Infrastructures v. Pansare Lawad Sallagar further reflects this changing outlook. The court differentiated between a lawyer appearing as a 'counsel' in arbitration and as an 'advocate' in court, suggesting that CFAs could be permissible in arbitrations. This distinction, based on the definition of 'advocate' under the Advocates Act, supports the argument for CFAs in international arbitration, where practitioners, including foreign lawyers, may not fall under the traditional definition of 'advocates' in Indian law.

Learning from International Models:

India can draw lessons from jurisdictions like Singapore, which have embraced CFAs in international and domestic arbitration. Singapore's Legal Profession (Amendment) Act 2022 permits CFAs for arbitration cases, reflecting a shift towards aligning domestic law with international arbitration practices. A similar approach in India could enhance its competitiveness as an arbitration hub.

The Way Forward:

Embracing CFAs, particularly in the context of international commercial arbitration, could significantly benefit India's legal landscape. The entry of foreign firms and practitioners with a stronger financial appetite for AFAs can lower barriers to entry and enhance access to justice. While maintaining safeguards against potential abuses, India could adopt a controlled framework similar to Singapore’s, allowing CFAs for sophisticated international disputes.

Conclusion:

The combination of third-party funding and AFAs offers a formidable opportunity for India to position itself alongside leading arbitration centers. By democratizing access to justice and fostering a more inclusive legal framework, these reforms can attract more arbitration cases and related investments, ultimately enhancing India's arbitration ecosystem and supporting economic growth.

 

Section Editor: Vaishnavi Rastogi | 15 Aug 2024 21:01pm IST


Tags : #LegalReform #InternationalArbitration #ContingentFeeArrangements #LegalInnovation #ArbitrationLaw #AccessToJustice #CommercialDisputes #LegalEthics #ThirdPartyFunding #IndiaLegalSystem

Latest News







Copyright A unit of White Code Global Consulting Pvt Ltd. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by A unit of White Code Global Consulting Pvt Ltd. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.