News By/Courtesy: Trupti Shetty | 11 Jul 2024 11:59am IST

HIGHLIGHTS

  • The Advisory Centre will have full legal personality and enjoy immunity similar to ICSID.
  • Without coordination with ICSID and PCA, the creation of the Advisory Centre could lead to inefficiencies and reduced trust in the system.
  • The Advisory Centre could leverage ICSID and PCA's experience in arbitration to enhance its training programs and legal support services.

The UNCITRAL Advisory Centre: Bridging Gaps in International Investment Dispute Resolution

 

Introduction:

On April 8, 2024, the UNCITRAL Working Group III (WGIII) finalized the draft statute for the establishment of an advisory centre on international investment dispute resolution, known as the Advisory Centre. This statute, crafted with inputs from over 70 state delegations and 40 international organizations, is set to be presented for approval at the upcoming 57th Commission session of UNCITRAL, scheduled between June 24 and July 12, 2024. This article explores the purpose, features, and potential impact of the Advisory Centre, especially on existing institutions like ICSID and the PCA.

Purpose and Main Features:

The primary aim of the Advisory Centre is to enhance the capacity of States and regional economic integration organizations in managing international investment disputes, focusing particularly on least developed and developing countries. According to Article 2 of the draft statute, the Advisory Centre will provide:

  1. Technical Training: Advising and training Member States on dispute prevention and resolution, and serving as a forum for exchanging information and best practices (Article 6).
  2. Legal Support and Assistance: Assessing cases, assisting in selecting adjudicators and relevant experts, and participating in drafting case briefs and documents for Member States (Article 7).

Only States or regional economic integration organizations can access the statute and become Member States (Article 10(3)). However, the Advisory Centre may provide technical training to non-members or other entities (Article 6(4)). The governance of the Advisory Centre will consist of a Governing Committee, a Secretariat led by an Executive Committee, and potentially an Executive Committee (Article 3). The funding will come from membership fees, service fees, and voluntary contributions from members and non-members (Article 8). The Advisory Centre will have full legal personality and enjoy immunity similar to ICSID.

Interaction with ICSID and PCA:

While the Advisory Centre's mission is commendable, ICSID and PCA already offer similar training and advisory services. ICSID, although not mandated by the Washington Convention, has provided extensive training for state officials, practitioners, lawyers, and arbitrators, as detailed in its annual reports. The PCA also conducts outreach and training programs, such as the investment arbitration training program for government officials co-organized with India's Ministry of External Affairs in 2022. Despite these overlaps, ICSID and PCA primarily focus on administering and facilitating disputes rather than training and advising disputing parties. The Advisory Centre's additional role in providing legal support and assistance during disputes is unique.

Potential Fragmentation and Need for Coordination:

The establishment of the Advisory Centre may risk further fragmenting international investment law, a field already prone to regulatory disorder due to overlapping competencies and differing policies among multiple international legal regimes. Without coordination with ICSID and PCA, the creation of the Advisory Centre could lead to inefficiencies and reduced trust in the system. To mitigate this risk, the Advisory Centre, ICSID, and PCA should coordinate their training activities, share resources, and organize joint educational initiatives. This collaboration would align their efforts towards benefiting the broader investment community. The Advisory Centre could leverage ICSID and PCA's experience in arbitration to enhance its training programs and legal support services.

Conclusion:

While the Advisory Centre aims to make the investment dispute settlement system more efficient, its success will largely depend on effective coordination with ICSID and PCA. By working together, these institutions can avoid fragmentation and enhance the overall coherence and efficiency of international investment dispute resolution.

Section Editor: Harshita Kumari | 13 Jul 2024 19:58pm IST


Tags : #UNCITRAL #InvestmentDisputes #InternationalLaw #DisputeResolution #AdvisoryCentre #ICSID #PCA #LegalTraining #InvestmentArbitration

Latest News







Copyright A unit of White Code Global Consulting Pvt Ltd. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by A unit of White Code Global Consulting Pvt Ltd. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.