News By/Courtesy: Neha Mishra | 17 Nov 2021 12:21pm IST


  • A petition is submitted in the High Court by 4 people regarding organ donation
  • The petitioners contended that they be allowed to swap transfer organs even though they are not close/ personal relatives
  • The High Court allowed the petition and provided changes to the Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994

In a critical judgment in regards to organ transplantation laws in India, the Kerala High Court on Monday decided that regardless of whether giver and beneficiary are not close family members, "swap transplants" will be allowable given the organ contributor has a special explanation. This judgment which also prescribed changes to the Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994 (Act) was passed by Justice N Nagaresh. 

The Court zeroed in principally on Section 9 of the said Act. While Section 9(3) grants organ transfers between people who are not close to family members, Section 9(3A) disallows trade transplantation between not-close to family members. This, the Court believed, is irrational and accordingly, the arrangement should be perused down to give full impact to Section 9(3). "At the point when Section 9(3) grants relocate of organs to people not being a close to a relative, with the earlier endorsement of the Authorisation Committee, there is no rationale or reasoning to say that trade exchange won't be permitted when individuals from each pair are not close to family members, regardless of whether the Authorisation Panel supports such exchange. In this manner, Section 9(3A) ought to be perused down to give full impact to Section 9(3) under which non-close to relative transfers are permitted with the endorsement of the Authorisation Board," the judgment expressed.

The central matters of the Court's structure were triple:

• Sub-sections (3A) (a) and (b) of Section 9 of the Act to the degree it licenses organ transfers just in instances of close to family members and diminishes the powers of Authorisation Committee to support such non-close to relative transfers in any event, for extraordinary reasons as considered in Section 9(3), must be perused down, to align with Section 9(3).

• Swap Transplants will be allowable regardless of whether each pair of benefactor beneficiaries are not close to family members, given there exists unique motivation to the contributor to give his/her organ as pondered in Section 9(3) and the Authorisation Council gives earlier endorsement for the trade transfers in the wake of examining the applications on the boundaries gave in Section 7(3) of the Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Rules, 2014.

• The arrangement under the head 'Swap Donation' contained in the Rules for Altruistic and Exchange Donation outlined by the Health and Family Welfare Department of Kerala, according to Government Order dated 15.02.2018, to the degree it licenses Swap Transfers just between close to family members, will be out of commission, as it conflicts with the arrangements of Section 9(3) of the Act.

The Court gave the request on an appeal documented by four people who were individuals from two donor-recipient sets. Applicants 2 and 4 were prepared to give their kidneys. The second applicant was the spouse of the third solicitor. The fourth applicant was the father-in-law of the son of the first applicant. Considering the mismatch of blood groups of second and third applicants and first and fourth applicants, they presented an application for swap transplantation. The authorisation panel, notwithstanding, dismissed the two petitions holding that the applicants don't go under the domain of 'close to the relative' according to the said Act and the rules of the Kerala Government.

This provoked them to move toward the High Court through advocates TP Sajid and Shifa Latheef. Justice Nagaresh expressed that the Act thinks about non-close to relative organ transplantation and the condition is that the giver ought to have a unique justification for giving authorisation for transplantation and earlier endorsement ought to be gotten from the Authorisation panel. Additionally, the Court submitted that Section 7 of the Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Rules, 2014, gives solid and adequate protections to guarantee that business expectation isn't the inspiration of a given proposition for organ transplantation and empowers the authorisation panel to investigate the recommendations in a compelling way. It hence held that swap transplantation can likewise be allowed between non-close to family members and guided the authorisation council to consider the petitions of the applicants over again.

Section Editor: Kadam Hans | 17 Nov 2021 20:46pm IST

Tags : #organ #transplant #swap transfer #petition #High Court #Kerala #1994 Act #Kerala Govt. #non-personal relative #Organ donation and transplant act

Latest News

Copyright Kalyan Krishna MediaZ Private Limited. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Kalyan Krishna MediaZ Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.