News By/Courtesy: Neha Mishra | 01 Dec 2021 15:24pm IST


  • An application for bail was submitted in the High Court of Madras by a youtuber.
  • He was in custody for making slanderous remarks against the previous and present CMs of Tamil Nadu.
  • The HC granted the bail considering his written statement and the time he had already served in the custody

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court allowed bail to YouTuber 'Sattai' Durai Murugan, blamed for giving a critical discourse against previous Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Late M Karunanidhi and present Chief Minister MK Stalin. Justice K Murali Shankar permitted the applicant's bail application, after considering his written statement expressing that he will shun offering any disdainful or individual comments against anybody, that he was experiencing medical problems, and had been under the custody of the authority since October 11.

According to the arrangement, Murugan and different individuals from the Naam Tamilar Katchi (NTK) party assembled infringing upon COVID-19 standards after they were denied consent to organize a protest. During this social event, Murugan purportedly offered disparaging comments intending to penetrate public harmony and peacefulness. The complainant, an individual from the DMK ideological group, saw the discourse of the candidate and one more on a YouTube Channel called Ravana, in which CM Stalin was taunted.

It was presented that the video was expected to affront the CM, incite public harmony and make hatred between various classes. It was brought to the Court's consideration that the petitioner had delivered a comparable video two years prior because of which bodies of evidence had been enlisted against him. The Congress Committee had likewise documented an intervention application for the situation, guaranteeing that Murugan in his discourse upheld the prohibited fear monger association LTTE and had straightforwardly compromised individuals from the Congress Party by expressing that LTTE can perform occurrences, for example, the suicide bombarding which killed previous Prime Minister of India Rajiv Gandhi.

Counsel for the candidate then again contended to the Court that the petitioner ought to be delivered on bail as he was experiencing medical problems, and needed clinical therapy. After hearing all gatherings, the Judge cited Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. who said, "Your Liberty to swing your clench hand closes exactly where my nose starts." Justice Shankar saw that albeit the ability to speak freely and articulation is a globally perceived right, Article 19(3) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) thinks about that right of the right to speak freely of discourse can be directed to respect the privileges of others and in light of a legitimate concern for public request, general wellbeing or ethics.

Indeed, even the Constitution, the Court noted, accommodates sensible limitations against the right to speak freely in light of a legitimate concern for power and honesty of India, security of the State, cordial relations with unfamiliar States, public request, fairness or ethical quality or corresponding to hatred of court, maligning or impelling to an offence. The Court called attention to that the exemptions were given a liberal understanding by Constitution Benches.

It was thought that the Additional Public Prosecutor appropriately brought up that the discourse was fundamentally slanderous. Notwithstanding, the Court talked about the endeavour put together by the petitioner wherein he expressed that he lamented the words he articulated against the CM, and would not do as such later on. After considering the statement and the applicant’s wellbeing, the Court conceded Murugan abandon execution of an obligation of 25,000.

Further, the applicant was approached to present an amount of 25,000 for each case to the Chief Minister Public Relief Fund and coordinated not to deliver any injurious discourse or comments. Advocate N Mohideen Basha showed up for the candidate. The respondent was addressed by Additional Public Prosecutor R Meenakshi Sundaram, and the intervenors were addressed by Advocate M Maharaja.

Section Editor: Kadam Hans | 01 Dec 2021 20:26pm IST

Tags : #High Court #Madras #youtuber #slander #congress #MK Stalin #protest #custody #bail #DMK

Latest News

Copyright Kalyan Krishna MediaZ Private Limited. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Kalyan Krishna MediaZ Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.